According to my friends, im a very good teacher. I personally agree, as I am not born a genius, so I understand how to think and learn from zero to where I am currently, be it chess, sports, academics etc. I will not be successful, but I am very confident

I coached my high school chess team (my school is famous for chess and the first Malaysian GM is from my school as well). I am a jack of all trades but master of none. I can teach English, Chinese, Chess, Law, basic Chemistry and Physics, Mathematics, cooking etc. I will teach the basics and explain why are we doing what, the reasoning should be the driving cause of like, for example why do we put garlic into the pan before any other ingredients? It is to extract the fragrance of it, but there will be exceptions such as when the cooking requires a hot pan that might burn it. This above explained that the essential goal is to extract the essence of garlic, so blindly putting garlic as first ingredient is not always the case, correct. Its all about the motives, like ask oneself: 'why do people do that?' That is how i will teach. Another example is lets say Chess, why I recommend 1.d4 to play London Systems? I will explain that it is easy for their rating, how the pieces can manuever fast and be on offense position in shorter amount of moves compared to playing 1.e4 king's pawn where the opponet can react with various opening lines that is hard to react to for a beginner. Too much to explain in a single box, I dont mind an interview.